Note that this is a larger copy of the picture printed in the magazine.
A search for renewals was done in publications for the years 1968 and 1969. There were no listings for this magazine's title; The only listing with "Hollywood" in the title was for Hollywood Patterns, published by a different company, Conde-Nast. There's no evidence of continuing copyright for the magazine.
This work is in the public domain because it was published in the United States between 1929 and 1963, and although there may or may not have been a copyright notice, the copyright was not renewed. For further explanation, see Commons:Hirtle chart and the copyright renewal logs. Note that it may still be copyrighted in jurisdictions that do not apply the rule of the shorter term for US works (depending on the date of the author's death), such as Canada (70 years p.m.a.), Mainland China (50 years p.m.a., not Hong Kong or Macao), Germany (70 years p.m.a.), Mexico (100 years p.m.a.), Switzerland (70 years p.m.a.), and other countries with individual treaties.
Additional source information:
This is a publicity photo taken to promote a film actor. As stated by film production expert Eve Light Honthaner in The Complete Film Production Handbook, (Focal Press, 2001 p. 211.):
"Publicity photos have traditionally not been copyrighted. Since they are disseminated to the public, they are generally considered public domain, and therefore clearance by the studio that produced them is not necessary."
Nancy Wolff, includes a similar explanation:
"There is a vast body of photographs, including but not limited to publicity stills, that have no notice as to who may have created them." (The Professional Photographer's Legal Handbook By Nancy E. Wolff, Allworth Communications, 2007, p. 55.)
Film industry author Gerald Mast, in Film Study and the Copyright Law (1989) p. 87, writes:
"According to the old copyright act, such production stills were not automatically copyrighted as part of the film and required separate copyrights as photographic stills. The new copyright act similarly excludes the production still from automatic copyright but gives the film's copyright owner a five-year period in which to copyright the stills. Most studios have never bothered to copyright these stills because they were happy to see them pass into the public domain, to be used by as many people in as many publications as possible."
Kristin Thompson, committee chairperson of the Society for Cinema and Media Studies writes in the conclusion of a 1993 conference with cinema scholars and editors, that they "expressed the opinion that it is not necessary for authors to request permission to reproduce frame enlargements. . . [and] some trade presses that publish educational and scholarly film books also take the position that permission is not necessary for reproducing frame enlargements and publicity photographs."[1]
Ursprunglig uppladdningslogg
Den ursprungliga beskrivningssidan fanns här. Alla följande användarnamn finns på en.wikipedia.
{{Information |Description=Photo of actress Vivien Leigh as Scarlet O'Hara. |Source=[http://archive.org/stream/hollywood30fawc#page/n549/mode/2up page 41] middle photo. Hollywood (magazine) |Date=[http://archive.org/stream/hollywood30fawc#page/n513/mod...
Den här filen innehåller extrainformation som troligen lades till av en digitalkamera eller skanner när filen skapades. Om filen har modifierats kan det hända att vissa detaljer inte överensstämmer med den modifierade filen.
Rubrik
Vivien Leigh
Källa
Bettmann
Erkännande/leverantör
Bettmann Archive
Avbildad person
Vivien Leigh
Skapare
Contributor, Bettmann
Bildtitel
(Original Caption) Head and shoulders portrait of British actress Vivien Leigh, wearing ruffles and ribbons as Scarlett O'Hara in the film 'Gone with the Wind', 1939.
Kort titel
SF26439
Den som äger upphovsrätten
This content is subject to copyright.
Exponeringstidpunkt
1 januari 1939 kl. 08.00
Orientering
Normal
Upplösning i horisontalplan
72 dpi
Vertikal upplösning
72 dpi
Kategori
E
Specialinstruktioner
Not Released (NR) This image is intended for Editorial use (e.g. news articles). Any commercial use (e.g. ad campaigns) requires additional clearance. Contact your local office to see if we can clear this image for you.